<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wasatch Powderkeg 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/</link>
	<description>photographs. news. thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:22:26 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Turley</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Turley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-61</guid>
		<description>@John.  Thanks, I&#039;ll take a look.  I was thinking maybe it was my grafmatics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John.  Thanks, I&#8217;ll take a look.  I was thinking maybe it was my grafmatics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-60</guid>
		<description>The last few images(4x5) from this Powderkeg series light leaks form in the middle of your images in a square. This is a common thing with the Super D. 
    I noticed that I got the same with my D  You can get rid of this glare affect by just putting your head over the chute, blocking any light from coming in through the top. 

You can also just compose the image flip the mirror up to seal the top and then manually pull the M lever. Hope this helps. 

All the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last few images(4&#215;5) from this Powderkeg series light leaks form in the middle of your images in a square. This is a common thing with the Super D.<br />
    I noticed that I got the same with my D  You can get rid of this glare affect by just putting your head over the chute, blocking any light from coming in through the top. </p>
<p>You can also just compose the image flip the mirror up to seal the top and then manually pull the M lever. Hope this helps. </p>
<p>All the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-59</guid>
		<description>So when are you going to post more work. Love to see it

best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when are you going to post more work. Love to see it</p>
<p>best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Turley</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Turley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Thanks Brandon.  Sorry for the delayed reply...

I shoot on all sorts of different equipment - LF, MF, &amp; digital.  The smokejumpers were shot on my Deardorff 8x10 with a 100 year-old Wollensack, but most of the landscapes are 4x5, 120, &amp; digital.  For 4x5, I use Schneider lenses on a Linhof (for sharp commercial stuff), but have a  bunch of old-tech lenses on the Graflex and Speed Graphics.  Nothing too fancy, a lot of it just comes from shooting a bigger piece of film...

btw, I enjoyed reading your treatise on film vs. digital.  Very nice.  Always a pleasure to see others shooting film!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Brandon.  Sorry for the delayed reply&#8230;</p>
<p>I shoot on all sorts of different equipment &#8211; LF, MF, &#038; digital.  The smokejumpers were shot on my Deardorff 8&#215;10 with a 100 year-old Wollensack, but most of the landscapes are 4&#215;5, 120, &#038; digital.  For 4&#215;5, I use Schneider lenses on a Linhof (for sharp commercial stuff), but have a  bunch of old-tech lenses on the Graflex and Speed Graphics.  Nothing too fancy, a lot of it just comes from shooting a bigger piece of film&#8230;</p>
<p>btw, I enjoyed reading your treatise on film vs. digital.  Very nice.  Always a pleasure to see others shooting film!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Wright</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 01:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Hey! Your work is fantastic! I love the adventure stuff on your site! Was wondering what equipment you use? Those shallow depth of field landscapes are brilliant! What lens are you using on your 4x5? And the blurry full body portraits of the skydivers! What are you using for those? Amazing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! Your work is fantastic! I love the adventure stuff on your site! Was wondering what equipment you use? Those shallow depth of field landscapes are brilliant! What lens are you using on your 4&#215;5? And the blurry full body portraits of the skydivers! What are you using for those? Amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Turley</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Turley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 17:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-53</guid>
		<description>@Adam

Yes, I have a Graflok back on my Super D and about a dozen Grafmatic holders, which are a perfect combination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam</p>
<p>Yes, I have a Graflok back on my Super D and about a dozen Grafmatic holders, which are a perfect combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 00:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hello. I noticed on your 4x5 images your using a grafmatic holder. Did you modify your D?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. I noticed on your 4&#215;5 images your using a grafmatic holder. Did you modify your D?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Your photos are inspirational - amazing.  Glad to see someone still using film...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your photos are inspirational &#8211; amazing.  Glad to see someone still using film&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Nabaum</title>
		<link>http://matthewturley.com/blog/2009/03/17/375/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Nabaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://matthewturley.com/blog/?p=375#comment-46</guid>
		<description>These portraits turned out great.
I enjoyed looking at every one.
I wish I would have done powderkeg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These portraits turned out great.<br />
I enjoyed looking at every one.<br />
I wish I would have done powderkeg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
